Career
Your rights during a background check
Background checks are regulated, you have rights when one is used against you, and the commonest problem is an error nobody has looked at.
When an employer uses a third-party background check, federal law requires written notice and your consent first. If the report leads to a decision against you, the employer must give you a copy and a summary of your rights before finalising it, so there is a window to respond.
That window exists because these reports contain errors with some regularity — mismatched identities, records that were sealed or dismissed, outdated information. The reporting company must investigate a dispute, usually within a defined period, and correct what it cannot verify.
Several states and cities restrict when criminal history may be asked about, commonly delaying it until after a conditional offer, and some limit how far back an employer may look. These rules are local.
References are less regulated but more straightforward: ask people first, tell them what the role is, and give them the context to be useful. A referee taken by surprise is a weaker referee regardless of their opinion of you.
What to do next. If a check is used against you, ask for the copy and the rights summary, and dispute anything inaccurate with the reporting company in writing.
studentaid.gov outranks this page. Rules, figures and dates change
between academic years. This is written to help you read the official sources, not to
stand in front of them. Start there.
Nothing here is a determination. We cannot tell you what you qualify
for, and no website can. The programme and the office that runs it decide that, after
you apply.
Still have a question?
Describe what you are trying to work out and a member of the team will answer, or direct you to the office that makes the decision.