What telehealth handles well, and what it does not
A genuinely useful route for a defined set of situations, and a poor substitute for others.
Telehealth works well for follow-up on a known condition, medication review, discussion of results, mental health consultations, and many straightforward complaints where examination adds little. For these it saves time and travel without reducing quality.
It handles poorly anything requiring physical examination, diagnostic equipment, or a procedure. A consultation that concludes with a request to attend in person has not failed, but it is worth anticipating where that is likely.
Licensing is tied to the state the patient is in at the time of the consultation, not where the clinician is based, which affects anyone travelling or living across a state line.
Coverage and cost vary by plan and have changed repeatedly. Confirming what a visit will cost before booking avoids the main complaint people have about it.
Still have a question?
Describe what you are trying to work out and a member of the team will answer, or direct you to the office that makes the decision.